-- yeah, I think it's time for a tag. *g* (Though the thought of going back to tag all of my linkspams... oh god. /o\ I NEVER MEANT TO GET INTO THIS HABIT, YOU GUYS!)
+
eccentricyoruba on
historical globalization+
such_heights on recent events+
some gorgeous photos of Afghanistan+
Beau Sia: Check Yourself+
oyceter on
30 Rock (& Tiger Beatdown
here)
+
Asian American Women in Leadership conference+
Historians admit to inventing ancient Greeks (... oh, The Onion. xD)
+
crossedwires:
on a ship at sea: a tempestuous noise+
Driving While Brown (via
the_future_modernes)
+
crossedwires has a batch of
Undercovers icons!
+
some more Undercovers icons!+
Pompeiian wall painting of a threesome, via my tumbleroll!
+
Petition for National Holiday for Native Americans+
2010 Asian American music festival+
wistfuljane:
on Fanlore's tropes and genres,
more on Fanlore and its Tropes & Genres category+ a
blogspam by angry asian man (includes several links on The Social Network, for those of you who are interested!)
+
Oxfam urges that aid for Haiti be earmarked for agriculture+
9th Conference of the Puerto Rican Studies Association+
Kollaboration in Seattle, 10/23
+
Cayman Islands Brewery recycles for a cause (via
Repeating Islands)
+
Get Arthur and Gwen Laid Campaign (Hello Merlin fandom! &hearts Maybe I will come back to you one day...)
+
Confounding Fathers: The Tea Party's Cold War Roots+ The lovely
cherrybina has put up a
picspam/math poll that is EXCEEDINGLY HAPPY-MAKING TO MY NERDY SELF, JUST SAYIN'.
+
Deb Reese on Neil Gaiman+
Reconsider Columbus Day+
axelrod on
Spirit Day+ Kate Harding
On Good Kids and Total Fucking Assholes+
trinker:
Render unto... (interesting thoughts on translation!)
+
Oh Aaron Sorkin, no.+
Glee linkspam at
access_fandom+ This
female character flowchart pisses me off.
This post explains some of the reasons why;
inkstone's
linkspam goes into further detail.
marina makes an
interesting point, but to me, the chart reduces all those strong female characters AND REAL WOMEN to their (perceived as) problematic characteristics for... what, exactly? We already hold women- real and fictional- to impossibly high and contradictory standards; I'm not happy with the fact that the chart flattens all those different contexts to highlight their flawed narratives/perceived negatives. We should be talking about how these women are flawed and STRONG/AWESOME ANYWAY, not reducing them to their flaws, and frankly, I don't see the chart furthering that discussion much. Even if the creators are just having a spork at notions of/expectations for "strong female characters," this is
so totally not the best format in which to do it. **
eta for
bossymarmalade on
Yoko Ono, because YES.
+
VAMP responds to "Prostitutes of God" documentary+
more links from
vi+
Surprise-- the Very Dark Side of US History (trigger warning applies)
+
Bechdel Test Comment-ficathon!